Philadelphia Personal Injury Attorney | Soloff & Zervanos, P.C. | Free Consultation
Contact Philadelphia personal injury attorney from Soloff & Zervanos, P.C. They will help you seek compensation that covers all of the needs you and your family will have today and in the years to come.
Logo 215-929-7216 866-597-8572
215-929-7216 1525 Locust Street 8th Floor Philadelphia, PA19102
610-550-8392 38 N 6th Street Reading, PA19601
610-839-7823 612 Hamilton Street The Trifecta Building 2nd Floor Allentown, PA19601
717-537-9244 8 North Queen Street 11th Floor Lancaster, PA17603
856-406-2242 457 Haddonfield Rd, Suite 540 Cherry Hill, NJ08002
212-804-8125 200 Park Ave, Suite 1700 New York, NY08002
Soloff & Zervanos, P.C. is now offering telephone or Zoom video conferencing service for clients who prefer to meet remotely. Call our office at 866-597-8572 to schedule a meeting with us either over the phone or via Zoom.
Local: 215-929-7216
Toll Free: 866-597-8572
  • Free Consultation
  • Calls Answered 24/7
  • 6 Locations
Local: 215-929-7216
Toll Free: 866-597-8572

What is overdiagnosis, and is it harmful?

On behalf of Soloff & Zervanos, P.C. Posted in Medical Malpractice on Friday, September 11, 2015.

Pennsylvanians may be familiar with the issue of misdiagnosis in the medical world, but they may not know that the topic of overdiagnosis has been a hot one as of late. Overdiagnosis is an especially pertinent issue in the area of breast imaging with regards to the screening of diseases such as breast cancer.

Overdiagnosis is a medical term that refers to correctly identifying or diagnosing a disease early on while it is at its most nascent stage, when treating the disease may not only be deemed unnecessary, but it may actually pose a health risk and be outright harmful to the patient’s long term prognosis. This is entirely different from diagnosing a false positive, which is a situation that arises when an administered diagnostic test incorrectly returns a result that confirms the presence of a disease even though the patient has no afflictions whatsoever.

Overdiagnosis is relatively common and can in fact be directly attributed to the ever-expanding definition of disease. Its promulgation is a natural consequence that arises from the commonly held belief that the earlier a disease is identified the more likely it is for the patient to avoid mortality from said disease. Essentially it is a logical consequence of the popular idiom “an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure.”

Overdiagnosis can also be cultural. The boundary that delineates healthy from diseased is more or less arbitrarily set. The technology that is used to probe ever deeper into the basic makeup and structure of our bodies continues to improve and uncover abnormalities that were previously unknown but nevertheless harmless and innocuous.

Thus, the threshold for the boundary between diseased and healthy will always be set at a level where it will be more likely that doctors will err on the side of caution by over diagnosing a patient rather than miss the disease entirely. That being said, in some situations treating a disease that does not actually exist can harm a patient. Patients who believe their health has been made worse due to overdiagnosis may need to seek legal help to learn more about the remedies available to them.

Source: Diagnostic Imaging, “Q&A: Problem with Diagnosing, but Not Overdiagnosing, mTBI,” Deborah Abrams Kaplan, Aug. 19, 2015