Philadelphia Personal Injury Attorney | Soloff & Zervanos, P.C. | Free Consultation
Contact Philadelphia personal injury attorney from Soloff & Zervanos, P.C. They will help you seek compensation that covers all of the needs you and your family will have today and in the years to come.
Logo 215-732-2260 866-597-8572
215-732-2260 1525 Locust Street 8th Floor Philadelphia, PA19102
610-372-2900 38 N 6th Street Reading, PA19601
610-433-1100 612 Hamilton Street The Trifecta Building 2nd Floor Allentown, PA19601
717-394-0100 8 North Queen Street 11th Floor Lancaster, PA17603
856-354-1175 457 Haddonfield Rd, Suite 540 Cherry Hill, NJ08002
212-297-2506 200 Park Ave, Suite 1700 New York, NY08002
Local: 215-732-2260
Toll Free: 866-597-8572
  • Free Consultation
  • Calls Answered 24/7
  • 6 Locations
Local: 215-732-2260
Toll Free: 866-597-8572

Another Mass Shooting Forces Questions About Gun-Control Debate

On behalf of Soloff & Zervanos, P.C. Posted in Victims Of Crime on Thursday, May 29, 2014.

Last week, America added another mass shooting incident to an already long and distressing list. Six people were killed during a 22-year-old man’s shooting rampage, which occurred near Santa Barbara, California. Making the case even more chilling is the fact that the shooter revealed his plans ahead of time in a YouTube video.

After any incident of mass murder (defined as four or more deaths in a single incident), the gun-control debate is reignited, if only briefly. Those who largely or completely oppose gun control continue to say that the problem lies not with the availability of guns but with a failure of America’s mental health system. In a recent New York Times opinion piece, professor of clinical psychology Richard A. Friedman takes issue with that argument.

Friedman notes that mass shootings are highly publicized, but they accounted for only 0.15 percent of U.S. homicides in 2012. Most if not all of the shooters in these mass slayings were both mentally ill and inclined toward violence. But the same cannot be said for most of the shooters responsible for more than 99 percent of the other gun deaths.

The correlation between mental illness and violence is tenuous at best. Friedman says that only about 4 percent of the violent acts committed annually in the United States can be reasonably attributed to mental illness. A far bigger risk factor is drug and/or alcohol abuse. Compared to the general population, those with substance abuse problems are seven times more likely to commit acts of violence.

If the stated goal is to keep guns out of the hands of individuals who are statistically likely to be violent, how do we begin the screening process? Most individuals with mental illness do not meet criteria that would prohibit them from buying guns. And chances are that the non-mentally-ill individuals who are likely to be violent have an even easier time purchasing these weapons.

To be sure, the issues of violence prevention and gun control are complex in their own right. But if we are going to have these important discussions, we need to deal only with facts and statistics instead of continuing to promote false narratives. It seems clear that the argument for mental health screening as a prerequisite for gun ownership is misleading at best and, more likely, a tragic distraction from more effective solutions.

Source: New York Times, “Why Can’t Doctors Identify Killers?” Richard A. Friedman, May 27, 2014